by David Jodrey <jodreydb@aol.com>
Todd has been referring to meditation practices in his
songs since "Zen Archer", if not before. This custom
continues in his two most recent new-material albums,
No World Order ("find a way to...meditate all day") and
The Individualist ("lost in meditation"). Sometimes the
meditation-relevant material has been relatively veiled,
as in "Fix Your Gaze" and "Hammer in My Heart". In these
less-explicit references Todd is using an approach similar
to that attributed to Jesus. As the Biblical account goes,
when Jesus's disciples asked him why he taught the
public in parables, Jesus replied, approximately - so that
those who are GONNA get, get it - and so that those who
are NOT gonna get it DON'T get it (compare this to "in time
I'm gonna get it" from The Individualist).
However, with the notable exception of Healing, Parts 1-3,
which involves clear directions and ideological content,
Todd has not provided much guidance to the potential
meditator. It's as if he regards himself as a performer,
composer, commentator, etc. - but not a preacher or a
teacher. In fact, at times he seems to explicitly disavow
the role of spiritual leader - "don't you follow me now -
you've got to walk your own road if you walk it at all"
(Fair Warning.) At these times it's as if he wants an
audience, but not disciples. And yet, on the other hand,
there continues to be spiritual relevance to his stuff, and
he still advertises an "Alcazar Mystery School" on one
web site (the dreamy 1950s-style drawings of the
"campus", as well as the non-implementation of the
"registration" option, lead me to suspect that this is a
joke - although as it has been pointed out, much truth is
spoken in jest.)
The paragraphs above have had the intent of establishing
that material about meditation is, at least to some people,
Todd-relevant. I've recently encountered a book,
Minding Mind, A Course in Basic Meditation, published
by Shambhala Press in 1995. This is a collection of
meditation manuals from various Buddhist teachers from
China, Japan, and Korea, translated and with commentary
by Thomas Cleary, who has done many translations from
East Asian languages. Cleary has recently branched out into
doing translations from the Arabic as well - e.g. selections
from the Koran, and a book of advice said to be from
Greek philosophers such as Aristotle, Socrates, Plato etc.
which was circulated among Arabic-speaking ordinary
people during the Middle Ages but for which the Greek
originals, if any, have been lost.)
In the introduction to Minding Mind Cleary states his
belief that "conscious cultivation of consciousness has
been practiced by human beings for thousands of years".
Referring to Buddhism as a "mental science" that is
"extremely rich and complex", he sets forth "five general
categories" from Buddhism relating to differences in the
"orientations and methods" of meditation.
- "The meditation of the ordinary mortal". People
engage in this type of meditation with the purpose and
intention of enhancing their ordinary perceptions and
abilities. They do this because they want to improve
their well-being and confidence, and be more effective
and efficient in the "ordinary activities of life." This first
type of meditation is focused on dealing with the world in
conventional terms.
- The second type is quite different - it focuses, not on
dealing with the world as we ordinarily see it, but rather
on "transcending the world". The aim of this type of
meditation is a "profound peace of mind characterized by
extinction of psychological afflictions" - that is, a
"quiescent nirvana." Cleary asserts that "exceptional
psychic capacities are also commonly associated with
people who attain quiescent nirvana in this way." I
believe the ambiguity in Cleary's phrasing here is
intentional - one reading of this phrase is that "people
(Buddhists) commonly THINK that exceptional psychic
capacities ...." The other reading, which Cleary is not
disavowing, but not explicitly asserting either, is that
"exceptional psychic capacities REALLY ARE commonly
associated..." Cleary goes on to state that since people
who have attained quiescent nirvana habitually remain
in this state, "they do not ordinarily exercise these
capacities in a concerted manner." This statement implies
that they HAVE such capacities, but Cleary (a) could be
continuing to describe the common viewpoint, not his
own opinion (b) hasn't stated what these "psychic
capacities" are - since psychic doesn't necessarily mean
"twilight zone" stuff, but can mean simply "of, relating to,
affecting, or influenced by the human mind or psyche;
mental: psychic trauma; psychic energy". Chances are,
though, that he DOES mean more than just better
concentration, memory, ability to tell whether or not
someone is lying, etc. - although improvement in all these
is worthwhile in and of themselves.
I'm reminded of an exchange between two characters in a
science fiction novel by Cordwainer Smith, The Quest of
the Three Worlds. One person says, "I have powers.
Don't make me use them." The other replies, "I have
powers too. Nobody can make me use them."
- The third type of meditation is the cultivation of
altered states of consciousness. Cleary states that those
whose main aim is nirvana, type 2 above, may also use
these altered states of consciousness "for the purpose of
breaking attachments to conceptual and perceptual
conventions". Nevertheless, Buddhist teaching regards
this as dangerous, because there is the possibility of
addiction to "intoxicating trances." Altered states should
be used for "specific pragmatic purposes" rather than
self-indulgence. If used to excess, Buddhist teaching
warns of the risk of becoming obsessed with, "or as it is
said, 'being reborn under the sway of', unusual states."
- The goal of the fourth kind of meditation is the
"development of extraordinary capacities in the service of
other people and the world at large." The methods and
techniques used by those who have this aim may be "any
or all of those characteristic" of the approaches to
meditation mentioned above, "but with a different
orientation, in a different manner, and in a broader
context." Cleary states that the "range and scope of
meditational states and experiences" of people using this
fourth approach "exceed those of the lower types of
meditation by many orders of magnitude."
- According to this ancient classification, the highest
type of meditation is called "pure clear meditation
arriving at being-at-is", in Cleary's terminology. This is
said to be the nearest that an individual consciousness
can come to true objectivity, and produces the most
penetrating insight. "The realization of pure clear
meditation also enables its master to employ all the other
types of meditation method deliberately and freely,
without becoming fixated or obsessed."
The book from which these remarks are taken is a
collection of instruction manuals, ranging from 7th
century China to early 17th century Japan, which deal
primarily with ways of pursuing the goal of the fifth type
of meditation.
Cleary concludes his introduction by stating that "altered
mental and physical states could be mistaken by the
unwary for authentic spiritual experiences" - a warning
traditionally given by authentic Buddhism, as well as
more recently by the Roman Catholic Church.
In addition to familiarization with the philosophy,
phenomenology and possible pathology of meditation,
"preparatory study is also useful for recognition and
evaluation of teachers," an issue which Cleary asserts is of
serious concern to Westerners. Quoting a classical Zen
saying, "First awaken on your own, then see someone
else," Cleary warns, "If you go to a real teacher
unprepared, you will be wasting the teacher's time and
unconsciously demonstrating your own greed and
laziness as well. If you go to a false teacher unprepared,
you will be wasting your own time and putting yourself
and your dependents in danger besides."
Fair warning, I'd say.